Sven Hartge:
On 20.07.25 09:45, Niels Thykier wrote:

@Bacula team: I have split this into two bugs for you.

  - #1109499 remains RC and is about preinst defaulting to fail on a
    non-interactive upgrade test.

The problem here is that this question and the default to "no" is a very important safeguard against a critical upgrade problem WRT the DB changes that are going to happen.

[...]

Grüße,
Sven.

Hi Sven,

I appreciate you are between a rock and a hard place. Unfortunately, I cannot really help here. My mail was of administrative nature to ensure we had bugs that captured the problems observed.

Perharps debian-devel or other people that would be in similar situations can help. Concretely, I suspect the postgres/mariaDB maintainers would have been in a similar situation at some point (I think PostgreSQL has a yearly bump of data base format). Personally, I would probably reach out to the PostgreSQL maintainers / check the PG packaging.

Best regards,
Niels

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to