On Thu, Jul 03, 2025 at 06:46:05PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > Hi Julian, > > On 30-06-2025 14:20, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:42, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: > > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:41, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > Reading the MR related to this change [1] I got the impression that the > > > > bookworm branch of src:grub2 needs to land in bookworm first to prevent > > > > the risks of apt removing the bootloader. AFAICT this didn't happen yet. > > > > What's the plan here? > > > Julian says on Matrix: > > > > > we don't technically need the backport in stable for testing, apt applies > > > the Protected: yes at a package level, and will accordingly refuse to > > > move grub from stable because the flag is set in the testing one > > > You sounded quite concerned in [2] but the information in the quote above > doesn't sound like it's new information to you. What made you change you > mind?
I did not consider that Essential and Protected are evaluated by apt at the package level rather than the version level :D It just occured to me again when Luca pinged me :D -- debian developer - deb.li/jak | jak-linux.org - free software dev ubuntu core developer i speak de, en
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
