On Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:20:13 +0100 Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: > Control: tags -1 -moreinfo > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:42, Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 26 Jun 2025 at 19:41, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> wrote: > > > > > > [re-sending because I got the grub2 mail address wrong] > > > > > > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On 23-06-2025 19:29, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > > > The latest upload of shim-signed allows alternative dependencies on > > > > the systemd-boot signed packages. > > > > > > > > > Reading the MR related to this change [1] I got the impression that the > > > bookworm branch of src:grub2 needs to land in bookworm first to prevent > > > the risks of apt removing the bootloader. AFAICT this didn't happen yet. > > > What's the plan here? > > > > IIRC that was waiting for this: > > > > https://salsa.debian.org/grub-team/grub/-/merge_requests/77 > > > > Julian and Mate still waiting on that one before uploading to bookworm-p-u? > > Julian says on Matrix: > > > we don't technically need the backport in stable for testing, apt applies the Protected: yes at a package level, and will accordingly refuse to move grub from stable because the flag is set in the testing one > > So I believe we don't need to wait for a grub upload in order to have > shim-signed unblocked. Thanks.
systemd-boot-installer has been pulled into testing (and into D-I RC2), but shim-signed wasn't, despite the single unblock ticket grouping them. So now the functionality is broken in D-I RC2. If possible, it would be great if this was processed soon, to unbreak it, please. Thanks!
