Control: tag -1 wontfix Control: close -1 On Wed, 2025-06-18 at 18:12 +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > Hello John, > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 02:36:49PM -0700, John Johansen wrote: [...] > > We are about 20 patches away from the upstream kernel being able to > > do this. It will be a few weeks before we can even get to trying this > > but I will add it to the queue of tickets. Maybe I can even get some > > priority on it by tying it to our work to get apparmor available in > > fedora > > I have the impression you work with upstream on that issue and while the > bug report is correct there is no need for the Debian kernel team to get > active, right? And the impact for Debian users is practically void until > there is a kernel which allows to use apparmor and selinux together? > > In that case I see little benefit to keep this bug open, given that the > only action needed here is tracking when it's fixed upstream and add a > bug closer to d/changelog then. [...]
I agree this doesn't need to be kept open. This change isn't going to happen in Debian unless and until it is changed upstream. And no-one on the Debian kernel team seems to be in a position to help with the upstream change, unfortunately. Ben. -- Ben Hutchings Design a system any fool can use, and only a fool will want to use it.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
