Hi John, On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 02:36:49PM -0700, John Johansen wrote: > On 6/3/25 14:03, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote: > > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo > > > > Hi Laurent, > > > > On Tue, Jun 03, 2025 at 05:14:12PM +0200, Laurent Bigonville wrote: > > > reopen 872726 > > > found 872726 6.12.30-1 > > > thanks > > > > You reopened this very old issue. I see two aspects: We do not want to > > have bugs opened forever if there is no chance of a respective > > upstream change fixing the issue. > > > > So with this in mind I think it would be great if you can try to > > respin the convesation with upstream and see if there is movement on > > this topic. > > > > Otherwise, if there is no chance to implement this, we can mark it > > wontfix (and so this time with an explanation ;-)) and then close and > > archive it again. > > > > In short: any chance you can try to reach out to upstream for a > > current state on this topic and loop us back? > > > > Yes we can try, and honestly we need to try because this is going to > become more problematic when we start stacking apparmor with selinux > as more than just a demo. > > We are about 20 patches away from the upstream kernel being able to > do this. It will be a few weeks before we can even get to trying this > but I will add it to the queue of tickets. Maybe I can even get some > priority on it by tying it to our work to get apparmor available in > fedora
Do you have a reference were we can point at this bug for following the current status? Regards, Salvatore
