Le jeu. 15 mai 2025 à 10:51, Paul Gevers <elb...@debian.org> a écrit : > Just wondering (and not a blocker), why did you file this as a > pre-approval? The package is on the autoremoval list and delaying the > upload reduces the time for testing the fix by others.
Ok, but it's not my very first time doing this. I learn. > Thanks for testing that. Did you do any checking that the build was also > correct? If so, what did you check? I checked the diff from 1.59.03-9 in Testing with debdiff & diffoscope. I use rtorrent myself. I plan to go the extra mile and Salvage *torrent in Forky release cycle: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=ghostbar%40debian.org > I must admit I don't oversee all the consequences here, so I hope that > one of the other RT members can double check, but I think you should > upload to unstable already. See Sebastian response here: https://lists.debian.org/debian-release/2025/05/msg00593.html For some $reason reportbug does not auto-subscribe me to this RT bug ... I only saw the response by browing the list archive online. I'm ok to revert half of the changes and only keeping the 1 line change in d/control. > Why were the hardening changes dropped earlier? This package had been on life support for 10 years before adoption and the hardening patch was not mandatory to get something building and I forgot about it. > Paul Greetings, Alexandre
