Package: gcc-12
Version: 12.2.0-14
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: inqu...@babyawacs.com
Dear Maintainer,
modified latencies should be included as biosmodding is dangerous a f
of course the results and the risks are questionable but kernelpanic vs
flashing a bios system brick risk are different
some prefer 255latency gpu
but the throughput on system components is extremely hardware dependent.
GENTOO GEN2 is perfect for this too
i really believe this could enhance both.
debian and gentoo
all the best
Christian KISS
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.10
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500,
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-25-rt-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages gcc-12 depends on:
ii binutils 2.40-2
ii cpp-12 12.2.0-14
ii gcc-12-base 12.2.0-14
ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u10
ii libcc1-0 12.2.0-14
ii libgcc-12-dev 12.2.0-14
ii libgcc-s1 12.2.0-14
ii libgmp10 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1
ii libisl23 0.25-1.1
ii libmpc3 1.3.1-1
ii libmpfr6 4.2.0-1
ii libstdc++6 12.2.0-14
ii libzstd1 1.5.4+dfsg2-5
ii zlib1g 1:1.2.13.dfsg-1
Versions of packages gcc-12 recommends:
ii libc6-dev 2.36-9+deb12u10
Versions of packages gcc-12 suggests:
pn gcc-12-doc <none>
pn gcc-12-locales <none>
ii gcc-12-multilib 12.2.0-14
-- no debconf information
