Package: initramfs-tools-core
Version: 0.142+deb12u1
Severity: wishlist
X-Debbugs-Cc: inqu...@babyawacs.com
Dear Maintainer,
modified latencies should be included as biosmodding is dangerous a f
of course the results and the risks are questionable but kernelpanic vs
flashing a bios system brick risk are different
some prefer 255latency gpu
but the throughput on system components is extremely hardware dependent.
GENTOO GEN2 is perfect for this too
i really believe this could enhance both.
debian and gentoo
all the best
Christian KISS
*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***
* What led up to the situation?
* What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
ineffective)?
* What was the outcome of this action?
* What outcome did you expect instead?
*** End of the template - remove these template lines ***
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 12.10
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500,
'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 6.1.0-25-rt-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads; PREEMPT)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled
Versions of packages initramfs-tools-core depends on:
ii coreutils 9.1-1
ii cpio 2.13+dfsg-7.1
ii e2fsprogs 1.47.0-2
ii klibc-utils 2.0.12-1
ii kmod 30+20221128-1
ii logsave 1.47.0-2
ii udev 254.22-1~bpo12+1
Versions of packages initramfs-tools-core recommends:
ii busybox 1:1.35.0-4+b3
ii zstd 1.5.4+dfsg2-5
Versions of packages initramfs-tools-core suggests:
ii bash-completion 1:2.11-6
-- no debconf information
