On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 08:35:58PM +0200, Rene Engelhard wrote: > [ CCing the inkscape maintainer, too ] > > > Hi,
Hi Rene, > Am 28.04.25 um 20:25 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > > you missed the last line I've added there earlier today: > > Might cause regression: > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241620#c3 > > Indeed I missed it. (Actually didn't look at the contents when I wrote the > mail, just looked up the URL) [1] > > > Unfortunately the links there don't work, but "version update" makes me wary, > as applying a security patch is not really a "version update". Or it's just > badly formulated. I know as much as you know about that entry. > TTBOMK inkscape didn't regress with > https://tracker.debian.org/ews/1640383/accepted-poppler-25030-4-source-into-unstable/ > (did it? at least no inkscape update since then)... > > Poppler version updates break all the time, indeed. > > > But maybe the inkscape/poppler combo in bookworm breaks, didn't try... Maybe > the inkscape maintainer can help here. And who knows how likely "Not sure there is any other problem" is. I will not try to fix this CVE at this point in time, but this does not prevent other people from working on it if anyone disagrees. > Regards, > > > Rene cu Adrian
