On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 02:45:57PM -0400, Jeremy Bícha wrote: > On Mon, Apr 28, 2025 at 2:39 PM Rene Engelhard <r...@debian.org> wrote: > > Am 28.04.25 um 20:25 schrieb Adrian Bunk: > > > you missed the last line I've added there earlier today: > > > Might cause regression: > > > https://bugzilla.suse.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241620#c3 > > > > Indeed I missed it. (Actually didn't look at the contents when I wrote the > > mail, just looked up the URL) [1] > > > > > > Unfortunately the links there don't work, but "version update" makes me > > wary, as applying a security patch is not really a "version update". Or > > it's just badly formulated. > > > > TTBOMK inkscape didn't regress with > > https://tracker.debian.org/ews/1640383/accepted-poppler-25030-4-source-into-unstable/ > > (did it? at least no inkscape update since then)... > > > > Poppler version updates break all the time, indeed. > > > > > > But maybe the inkscape/poppler combo in bookworm breaks, didn't try... > > Maybe the inkscape maintainer can help here. > > Adrian, could you be more verbose about what you think might be incompatible?
I don't know more than what is in the SUSE Bugzilla. > Thank you, > Jeremy Bícha cu Adrian
