On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 01:36:05PM +0100, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote:
Apparently nobody cared enough.
or they just missed it.
No it wouldn't, there can be multiple facilities available. At any rate, IMO
the transition is pointless *for trixie*, as trixie won't be maintained in
2038. The point is to introduce new apis/abis/etc going forward, so that
future releases (which actually will be used in 2038) will be ready. That
does not necessitate breaking existing code/functionality.
I'm onboard with this argument, but then we wouldn't have needed to
do t64 at all.
No, there's a big difference between use cases which may involve *future
dates* and those that involve *current timestamps*.
