On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote:
Although it was my mistake, I think it might be reasonable
to warn when the dists/ (or at least incoming/) directory
contains architectures not listed in the @architectures
configuration variable.
I fully agree. Maybe it should even reject such packages, or
what do you think?
Ola,
From my perspective, I think that the architectures configuration
variable could be automatically determined from the union of the
dists/*/binary-* directories and contents of incoming/, or perhaps
(if you think there's a reason to exclude architectures present in
those directories) automatically determined only if left unconfigured.
If you do decide that rejecting is cleaner, 323614 (explain why
package goes into REJECT/) seems relevant, though I'd bias toward a
log file in the reject directory explaining specifics over man page
explanations of the possible reasons. I have some .debs in a reject
directory and I haven't had the time to figure out why.
Thanks again -- I appreciate debarchiver and your attention.
-neil
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]