Hi On Tue, Jun 13, 2006 at 11:34:11AM -0400, Neil Spring wrote: > > On Jun 12, 2006, at 6:10 PM, Ola Lundqvist wrote: > >>Although it was my mistake, I think it might be reasonable > >>to warn when the dists/ (or at least incoming/) directory > >>contains architectures not listed in the @architectures > >>configuration variable. > > > >I fully agree. Maybe it should even reject such packages, or > >what do you think? > > Ola, > > From my perspective, I think that the architectures configuration > variable could be automatically determined from the union of the > dists/*/binary-* directories and contents of incoming/, or perhaps > (if you think there's a reason to exclude architectures present in > those directories) automatically determined only if left unconfigured.
This would actually be a bit trickier than it first looks and the reason for that is that these directories are created using that variable... So we end up in a chicken and egg problem... > If you do decide that rejecting is cleaner, 323614 (explain why > package goes into REJECT/) seems relevant, though I'd bias toward a > log file in the reject directory explaining specifics over man page > explanations of the possible reasons. I have some .debs in a reject > directory and I haven't had the time to figure out why. I'll figure out some good way to handle this. > Thanks again -- I appreciate debarchiver and your attention. You are welcome and thanks for the cheer. Regards, // Ola > -neil > -- --- Ola Lundqvist systemkonsult --- M Sc in IT Engineering ---- / [EMAIL PROTECTED] Annebergsslingan 37 \ | [EMAIL PROTECTED] 654 65 KARLSTAD | | http://www.opal.dhs.org Mobile: +46 (0)70-332 1551 | \ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 / --------------------------------------------------------------- -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
