Dear Guillem, dear Daniel, On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 19:29:29 -0500 Daniel Kahn Gillmor <d...@fifthhorseman.net> wrote:
On Sun 2024-11-17 23:09:27 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Given https://github.com/ProtonMail/gosop/issues/25, I'm wondering > whether it would still be appropriate to provide "sopv (= 1.0)"?I agree that this isn't appropriate for claiming sopv 1.0. I've tried to update the debian BTS correctly here to indicate that this issue is a blocker for gosop claiming sopv status.
this is fixed by 1.0.0+git20241119.f089b6c-1 including upstreams fix. Do you think it's safe to claim sopv 1.0 now? Best regards, Martin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
