Hi! On Thu, 2024-11-14 at 20:31:58 -0500, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Package: gosop > Version: 1.0.0-1 > Severity: wishlist
> "gosop version --sopv" indicates that gosop now supports the > verification-only subset of the stateless openpgp interface. > > Some baseline testing confirms that this is the case. > > It would be great if the debian packaging could add a line to the > debian/control file: > > Provides: sopv (= 1.0) > > while also adding a debian/gosop.alternatives file so that /usr/bin/sopv > can use gosop as an alternative for sopv. > > See the packaging for rsopv, sqopv, and sopv-gpgv if you want some > examples for the debian/*.alternatives files. On Sun, 2024-11-17 at 21:27:06 +0000, Martin Dosch wrote: > thank you very much for your input. I have updated gosop but not yet > uploaded it as I am not sure what priority would be appropriate. > Do you have any suggestions? Given https://github.com/ProtonMail/gosop/issues/25, I'm wondering whether it would still be appropriate to provide "sopv (= 1.0)"? Personally, this is one of the upstream issues that is preventing me from adding explicit gosop support into dpkg, which I'll love to do once it's ready! Thanks for maintaining it. :) Thanks, Guillem
