Hi again, since I learned you were not happy with the upload of tzc I removed the package from the delayed queue. Feel free to profit from the repository
https://salsa.debian.org/salvage-team/tzc for your own potential next upload. Please let me know if you want to take it over to some other place to let me remove the duplicate that might become outdated. Sorry for any inconvenience / misunderstanding I might have caused Andreas. Am Thu, Oct 31, 2024 at 04:58:21PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > Am Wed, Oct 30, 2024 at 05:11:09PM -0700 schrieb Theodore Ts'o: > > ... > > [1] > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#package-salvaging > > This page lists the possible indicators: > > NMUs, especially if there has been more than one NMU in a row. > which is true > > Bugs filed against the package do not have answers from the maintainer. > well, it was the case for the single bug > > > > There is one outstanding bug before you filed the ITS bug, and it was > > a man page typo fix. This wasn't particularly urgent to fix, > > Perfectly true. Its absolutely not urgent. > > > and it > > seems odd to call that "poorly maintained". > > Four NMUs in a row might be an indication that the maintainer lost > interest. > > > So if you're not going to actively taking over maintainership, why are > > you initiating the salvaging process? > > I said: "I admit I have no personal interest in this package and I do > not use it." I maintain several packages which I'm not using. I'm > perfectly fine if you disagree with the attempt to salvage and I can > easily remove the upload to delayed. My intention was genuinely to lend > a helping hand, and I apologize sincerely if it wasn’t received as such. > Please let me know if it caused any inconvenience, and I’ll be more than > happy to undo the upload. > > Kind regards > Andreas. > > -- > https://fam-tille.de -- https://fam-tille.de