* Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060608 14:24]:
> When I edit the ListHook script the changes don't take effect on a
> subsequent reprepro update run if there were no upstream changes and a
> --noskipold is required. It would be nice if reprepro could rerun the
> ListHook if the timestamp of the hook is newer than the filtered file.
I'm unsure about this.
I fear that this will cause more confusion than help. The timestamp of
the command can be checked, but not any data files it uses to get this,
so it will sometimes recognize changes, sometimes need the explicit
notification.
I'm currently considering the need for the explicit setting when
anything like this should be taken into account a more clean approach.
(Especially as working with timestamps always gives funny results with
time-skews).
Hochachtungsvoll,
Bernhard R. Link
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
