"Bernhard R. Link" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> * Goswin Brederlow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [060608 14:24]:
>> When I edit the ListHook script the changes don't take effect on a
>> subsequent reprepro update run if there were no upstream changes and a
>> --noskipold is required. It would be nice if reprepro could rerun the
>> ListHook if the timestamp of the hook is newer than the filtered file.
>
> I'm unsure about this.
> I fear that this will cause more confusion than help. The timestamp of
> the command can be checked, but not any data files it uses to get this,
> so it will sometimes recognize changes, sometimes need the explicit
> notification.
> I'm currently considering the need for the explicit setting when
> anything like this should be taken into account a more clean approach.
> (Especially as working with timestamps always gives funny results with
> time-skews).
>
> Hochachtungsvoll,
> Bernhard R. Link
True. I haven't thought about filters with extra files.
MfG
Goswin
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
