On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 11:26, Matthew Vernon <matt...@debian.org> wrote: > > On 06/08/2024 11:22, Luca Boccassi wrote: > > On Tue, 6 Aug 2024 at 11:10, Matthew Vernon <matt...@debian.org> > > wrote: > > >> The policy question of "should testing and unstable be > >> differentiated by os-release" isn't straightforward, and there > >> isn't consensus that the answer should be "yes", as you would like > >> it to be. > > >> Debian's current (and long-standing) answer to that question is > >> "no", and my view is that you have not advanced a sufficiently > >> compelling case that this answer should be changed. > > > > Sorry, I don't follow. How is that related to the implementation > > details of how to solve it? > > Well, because if the answer to the question is "no, testing and unstable > should not be differentiated by os-release", then there is no need to > come up with a system whereby they are differentiated.
Yes, I agree, that's what I was trying to convey, I guess I wrote it in a confusing way
