On 07.07.24 10:10, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
[...]
Patching sluice seems not trivial. Given that it's sole rdep is isahc,
would you be ok with me filing a RM request for it if I patch isahc to
use standard rust pipes ? imo this is the easiest option going forward.
The code changes look more doable than patching sluice.
I would ertainly be happy getting help with isahc, but I don't quite
understand what you are proposing concretely - how will patching isahc
also require an RM request?!?
isahc requires sluice only for some pipe functionality in two files.
Since patching sluice proves to be hard I'd
opt to patch isahc to use something like stdio::piped() rather than
sluice::pipe. Then I can file a RM request for sluice since it's not
used elsewhere and we can finish this transition.
best,
werdahias
