On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 08:06:45PM +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote: > Osamu Aoki wrote: > > [..] maybe what we should do is: > > > > GTK_IM_MODULE=scim as default for SCIM. > > GTK_IM_MODULE=xim as default for UIM. > > What's wrong with using GTK_IM_MODULE=xim everywhere? It always > works (in Linux).
True. > I gather that the separate input methods for GTK are only there to > provide "portability" to other systems, like MS Windows. But we > are discussing Debian here, i.e. Linux, so (if I understand it > correctly) we do not have to care about Windows portability, and > can use the "standard" xim. > > see http://mail.nl.linux.org/linux-utf8/2004-05/msg00004.html > > About the many different window managers, each (possibly) with > their own best way to start the IME: yes, this is a problem. But > it has to be solved somehow (I mean it cannot be left unsolved, > otherwise for many users, uim/scim, etc., mysteriously do not > work). It is more important for im-switch to pay attention to the > window managers than to pay attention to the locales. That sounds like too uch complication. Let me think a bit more. Simble global restart seem to work OK with recent SCIM now. SCIM seems robust for restart UIM: candidate window seems to have issue may be resolved by "sleep 1" > Maybe a "test protocol" for uim/scim should be devised which can > be sent to all Debian maintainers of window managers. If you impliment such an nice thing, let us know. Osamu -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
