Osamu Aoki wrote: > On Sun, May 21, 2006 at 08:06:45PM +0200, Jan Willem Stumpel wrote:
>>It is more important for im-switch to pay attention to the >>window managers than to pay attention to the locales. > > > That sounds like too much complication. Let me think a bit more. > > Simble global restart seem to work OK with recent SCIM now. > SCIM seems robust for restart > UIM: candidate window seems to have issue > may be resolved by "sleep 1" > > >>Maybe a "test protocol" for uim/scim should be devised which can >>be sent to all Debian maintainers of window managers. > > > If you impliment such an nice thing, let us know. > > Osamu The new im-switch (and the new uim-anthy) are much cleaner now. At last, the ~/.uim file is dead (other people were also annoyed by this, see http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/uim/2006-April/001452.html). I am doing some tests with different window managers, as well as with KDE and GNOME. It is very complicated because of the many side-effects of the various systems. scim is easier to set up than uim; for uim you have to start the GUI separately, using a different way for each WM. For instance in KDE you have to put something in ~/.kde/Autostart. I have always avoided using KDE and GNOME but now it seems I have to study them. Ya da. I will let you know the results when I make sense of them. This may take quite a long time, I am afraid. Regards, Jan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
