On Thu, 2023 Nov 23 22:44-05:00, Bo YU wrote: > > But likely the Chromium developer has picked this now: > 1. angle: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/angle/angle/+/5057086 > 2. base: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5054184 > 3. sandbox: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5056263 > 4. ffmpeg: > https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/third_party/ffmpeg/+/5054185 > > we have one dav1d to be left, but the developer told me he has did it.
Thanks Bo. It is good that the upstream is willing to accept patches for riscv64. I was worried that Google would not support the platform, in the same way that they do not support ppc64el. I had considered adjusting the patches here so that they can be applied after the ppc64el patches. (There is no way that a conditional patch set would be accepted by Debian---all the patches have to apply together.) But if the patches are accepted by the upstream, then there is no need to adjust the patches for Debian.
