Hi! On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 12:51 PM Daniel Richard G. <sk...@iskunk.org> wrote: > > Hello Bo YU, > > On Sun, 2023 Nov 19 10:01-05:00, Bo YU wrote: > > > > I have rebased the patchset base on 119.0.6045.159-1, there is no code > > changed but maybe small change will be happened on next version from > > upstream's supporting for riscv64. > > Do you have links/references for the upstreaming of riscv64 support? > I am interested to see the status of that in Chromium development. >
I made a summary about support riscv64 from Chromium upstream based on 116, see: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1051998#20 Sorry I promised that I will submit these patches to upstream but this has not happened due to being busy with other works. Another reason is that I known the support from upstream is alway in process and then the original patchset come from opensuse then other distros picked this as we did here so I am hesitant here it is suitable to submit these valuable patchset from us. But likely the Chromium developer has picked this now: 1. angle: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/angle/angle/+/5057086 2. base: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5054184 3. sandbox: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/src/+/5056263 4. ffmpeg: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromium/third_party/ffmpeg/+/5054185 we have one dav1d to be left, but the developer told me he has did it. > (Did Google accept all of the patches needed, or only a small > part of them?) I am not sure here so let's to see next step what happened. BR, Bo
