On Fri, 2023-05-19 at 13:57 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 02:44:01PM +0100, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > > ic. so I should have uploaded to bullseye-proposed-updates > > > instead? > > Any upload goes to p-u first, yeah. So the target should always be > > simply "bullseye", by preference. dak will accept a bunch of other > > things, including "stable", "bullseye-proposed-updates", "proposed- > > updates" and, as you've demonstrated, "bullseye-updates" and DTRT, > > but > > it's cleaner and less potentially confusing if everything uses the > > same. > > ok, thanks. that does make sense. > > > The relevant section of dev-ref implies this, fwiw. I think some > > combination of you and I wrote it. :-) > > oh dear. however upon re-reading 5.5.1 and 5.5.2 I've noticed that > 5.5.2 > says nothing about the suite in d/changelog and I think I'm going to > fix > that now :)
fwiw that's semi-intentional, because the point is that there is no difference from an uploader's perspective. "Uploads to stable-updates" don't exist as a thing; rather, some uploads to p-u are cherrypicked by SRM and copied to -updates. So uploaders shouldn't be trying to do anything different from a technical perspective, just remembering to request the -updates copy while discussing the request via the BTS. Regards, Adam
