Control: tags -1 + confirmed On Fri, 2023-05-12 at 08:50 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > hi, > > friendly ping on this. >
It's only been a week, and one of the SRMs has been on a publicised (fvo publicised being relevant to DDs) week away. It's a little soon to be chasing. :-( > On Thu, May 04, 2023 at 07:50:37PM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote: > > this is a pre-approval request, I have not uploaded this yet > > (except to > > unstable). > > the package has migrated to bookworm now. > > > [ Reason ] > > > > unfortunatly debian-security-support in both bullseye and bookworm > > are affected by - #1034077 > > "debian-security-support: Lots of noise about DEBIAN_VERSION 12 > > being > > invalid when upgrading bullseye→bookworm" > [...] > > > [ Other info ] > > As there will be no more bullseye point releases before the > > bookworm > > release, this probably needs to go in via bullseye-updates. Is > > d/changelog > > correct for this like it is? > > I'm not quoting the full bug report but the above is reason why this > should > go into *bullseye* before the bookworm release... I'm a bit confused here. Your own text above indicates that you're aware that there won't be any more point releases before the release, and that therefore the package *cannot* be in bullseye before the release. Point releases are the mechanism by which packages get updated in stable. In any case, please go ahead. Regards, Adam
