On 2023-04-27 Simon Josefsson <si...@josefsson.org> wrote: > > I have spent a little bit of effort on packaging 2.4.0. I have pushed > > this to salsa (sans tags) into 3 temporary branches that could be [...] > Hi,
> What do you think about uploading these to experimental, to allow > testing? > I have built your branch and there appears to be community interest in > having binary packages hosted somewhere, and I'm exploring options. My > fairly limited testing suggests they work, and resolve many fixed issues > that I've had with the 2.2.x series so I will use these myself going > forward. > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2023-April/066490.html > https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2023-April/066500.html Hello Simon, I do not indend to hijack/adopt gnupg2, so I am very reluctant to upload without some kind of go from Daniel or Eric. (Even to experimental.) However I have updated the GIT branches to 2.4.1 today. cu Andreas -- `What a good friend you are to him, Dr. Maturin. His other friends are so grateful to you.' `I sew his ears on from time to time, sure'
