> I have spent a little bit of effort on packaging 2.4.0. I have pushed
> this to salsa (sans tags) into 3 temporary branches that could be
> fast-forwarded:
> tmp-ametzler-pristine-tar   --ff->   pristine-tar
> tmp-ametzler-upstream       --ff->   upstream
> tmp-ametzler-v2.4           --ff->   debian/experimental

Hi,

What do you think about uploading these to experimental, to allow
testing?

I have built your branch and there appears to be community interest in
having binary packages hosted somewhere, and I'm exploring options.  My
fairly limited testing suggests they work, and resolve many fixed issues
that I've had with the 2.2.x series so I will use these myself going
forward.

https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2023-April/066490.html
https://lists.gnupg.org/pipermail/gnupg-users/2023-April/066500.html

/Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to