Hi Andres,
you have fixed the bugs in youtube-dl in d/changelog and have set target
distribution to "unstable" which in those teams I'm working with is a
signal that the package is actually uploaded. Since this is not the
case I have reset it to UNRELEASED when I fixed the watch file (no
matter whether we want to discontinue youtube-dl or not I think its
sensible to have a working watch file).
Since I'm not sure whether the package should be uploaded as is I simply
leave it to you. I'm perfectly fine with the switch to yt-dl - I just
did not any test of the compatibility script thus I would not feel good
to upload.
BTW, before uploading we should then outdated information from
README.source and either replace it by something more sensible or remove
it at all. I'm also wondering whether the string
2021.12.17+really-yt-dl-2022.11.11-1
is a better version number than just increasing the Debian revision.
For those who are interested I uploaded the latest version of youtube-dl
to bullseye-backports since there was a report that the current version
in bullseye has problems.
Regarding backporting yt-dlp: I would volunteer to upload yt-dlp also to
stable backports. However, I will do so only if the package is
maintained on salsa where I can easily push the branch to the
development repository. (To be clear here: I do not need hints how I
can push to some other locations. I know how it works but I do not
volunteer to do so.)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
