On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:18:42 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:40:04AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 22:54:50 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote:
> > > I think you misread my question. I totally see that there should be two
> > > .pot files, I only asked if we really need two directories for that...
> > 
> > Two set of .pot files and .po files, so that the .po files can be put in
> > each package independently (if I've missread you again, sorry O:).
> 
> Yeah, I meant that.

That implies that if you need two sets of .po files then you need to
have them in different dirs (at least given current Makefile.in.in
infrastructure).

regards,
guillem


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to