On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:18:42 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:40:04AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 22:54:50 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > I think you misread my question. I totally see that there should be two > > > .pot files, I only asked if we really need two directories for that... > > > > Two set of .pot files and .po files, so that the .po files can be put in > > each package independently (if I've missread you again, sorry O:). > > Yeah, I meant that.
That implies that if you need two sets of .po files then you need to have them in different dirs (at least given current Makefile.in.in infrastructure). regards, guillem -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]