On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 08:59:24PM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Fri, 2006-05-12 at 11:18:42 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > On Fri, May 12, 2006 at 10:40:04AM +0300, Guillem Jover wrote: > > > On Thu, 2006-05-11 at 22:54:50 -0500, Frank Lichtenheld wrote: > > > > I think you misread my question. I totally see that there should be two > > > > .pot files, I only asked if we really need two directories for that... > > > > > > Two set of .pot files and .po files, so that the .po files can be put in > > > each package independently (if I've missread you again, sorry O:). > > > > Yeah, I meant that. > > That implies that if you need two sets of .po files then you need to > have them in different dirs (at least given current Makefile.in.in > infrastructure).
So, what we do about the ChangeLog? Yet another one? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
