Martin Michlmayr writes ("Bug#366938: svn commit access to the d-i repo ..."):
> The DPL has already agreed that the decision of the d-i team was
> sound, see http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/05/msg00235.htmlAha! Right, well, I withdraw my earlier resolution and propose this one instead: WHEREAS 1. Sven Luther complains that he has been deprived of commit access to debian-installer's svn repository. 2. Access controls, and changes to them, are a standard response to sociopolitical problems and it is not for the TC to overrule those political processes. 3. While access controls sometimes make life more inconvenient, the tradeoff between the inconvenience and the supposed benefits is a political question. 4. The DPL had agreed, before Sven referred this issue to the TC, that the decision of the d-i team was sound (http://lists.debian.org/debian-boot/2006/05/msg00235.html). THE COMMITTEE CONCLUDES 5. This is not a technical complaint. 6. It is the Project Leadership's decision whether uphold or overturn the revocation of Sven's access. 7. We are pleased to see that the Project Leadership has the matter in hand; the Leader has our full support. 8. We are disappointed that the complainant did not bring the prior discussion - particularly, the decision by the Leader - to our attention. We would ask all disputants, when bringing a matter to the TC, to provide complete references to prior discussion and decisions. This saves time and avoids any appearance of impropriety. Ian. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
