On 2022-11-24 07:52:37 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote: > Am Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:54:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > > If I understood that BioConductor packages should not block other > > transitions. I've just pinged ftpmaster on IRC to check packages > > r-bioc-bsseq, r-bioc-dss, r-bioc-biocbaseutils and r-cran-ggrastr. > > The following packages are blocked by the packages in new: > > > > r-bioc-bitseq - should be removed from testing immediately bug just > > filed) > > r-bioc-multiassayexperiment > > r-bioc-demixt (bug #1024597 was just filed) > > r-bioc-scater > > r-bioc-mofa (just due dependencies) > > > > Do you want me to file RC bugs against r-bioc-multiassayexperiment, > > r-bioc-scater and r-bioc-mofa. > > Since r-bioc-scater is needed in autopkgtest of r-bioc-bluster[1] and > r-bioc-singler[2] probably also these two packages need a RC bug to not > block the transition. > > The test suite issue of r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation is discussed > with upstream[4]. I'm fine to remove it from testing for the moment as > well. > > Just let me know whether I should file the according bugs.
Please do. Cheers -- Sebastian Ramacher
