Am Tue, Nov 22, 2022 at 08:54:13PM +0100 schrieb Andreas Tille: > If I understood that BioConductor packages should not block other > transitions. I've just pinged ftpmaster on IRC to check packages > r-bioc-bsseq, r-bioc-dss, r-bioc-biocbaseutils and r-cran-ggrastr. > The following packages are blocked by the packages in new: > > r-bioc-bitseq - should be removed from testing immediately bug just filed) > r-bioc-multiassayexperiment > r-bioc-demixt (bug #1024597 was just filed) > r-bioc-scater > r-bioc-mofa (just due dependencies) > > Do you want me to file RC bugs against r-bioc-multiassayexperiment, > r-bioc-scater and r-bioc-mofa.
Since r-bioc-scater is needed in autopkgtest of r-bioc-bluster[1] and r-bioc-singler[2] probably also these two packages need a RC bug to not block the transition. The test suite issue of r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation is discussed with upstream[4]. I'm fine to remove it from testing for the moment as well. Just let me know whether I should file the according bugs. Kind regards Andreas. [1] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-bluster/28612583/log.gz [2] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-singler/28612594/log.gz [3] https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-structuralvariantannotation/28615556/log.gz [4] https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2022/11/msg00067.html -- http://fam-tille.de
