Am 10.03.2022 um 01:21 teilte Danai SAE-HAN (韓達耐) mit:

Hi Danai, hi Norbert,

I'm on the way to package the new version of cjk.

Do we still need "cjk-latex"? AFAICT it was introduced as transitional package in 2006. I tend to drop it now.

Hilmar

That is indeed strange, because as Hilmar pointed out, the upstream code of
CJK has not changed for years.

Which TeX engine are you running?
A minimal working example would be helpful.

--
sigfault

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to