Hi Curtis
That is indeed strange, because as Hilmar pointed out, the upstream code of
CJK has not changed for years.
Which TeX engine are you running?
A minimal working example would be helpful.
Regards
--
Danai
On Thu, 10 Mar 2022, 07:27 Hilmar Preuße, <hill...@web.de> wrote:
> On 3/9/22 19:37, Curtis Dean Smith wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> > When running a document with CJKutf.sty that rendered properly on
> > Bullseye, the emph, textbf, etc faces now appear as regular roman.
> > If I comment out the begin{CJK}{UTF8}{bsmi}, end{CJK}, and all
> > Chinese in the document, the emph, textbf, etc. faces render
> > properly.
> >
> I'm pretty sure the issue is not in cjk as the upstream code for cjk did
> not change between oldstable and stable. Could you provide a minimal
> example to test the issue?
>
> Hilmar
> --
> Testmail
>
>
