On Sun, Feb 27, 2022 at 10:25:32PM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: autodep8 > Version: 0.25 > Severity: important > > Hi, > > the dkms autopkgtest generated by autodep8 misses the "superficial" > restriction. Failing to build the kernel module is a good indicator for > something being broken, but being able to build a kernel module does not > say anything about its usability.
Yes. > Perhaps all (or at least most) autopkg tests generated by autodep8 > should have the superficial restriction, and that should be the default > when adding support for new package classes. Not necessarily. For most package types supported by autodep8, at least real unit tests are executed. dkms and python are exceptions in this regard.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
