On Sun, Apr 30, 2006 at 07:35:30PM +0200, Christian Pernegger said: > >So it looks like hdparm assumes that the kernel IDE layer is able to > >wake the drive up. Perhaps the SATA layer can't handle it yet? I will > >ask upstream, but it seems like a kernel issue at firts look. > > You're probably right, I'd suspected as much. Should I re-report vs. the > kernel-image? I'd personally rather not bug LKML about this, as I simply > don't know enough about developing. > > Feel free to forward the bug to whoever might be interested and include > my e-mail - I'll happily provide more info if someone tells me how to obtain > it.
I'll talk it over with the kernel team in the next few days, and probably reassign to them unless they think of anything hdparm might be doing wrong. Take care, -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Stephen Gran | You own a dog, but you can only feed a | | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cat. | | http://www.lobefin.net/~steve | | --------------------------------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
