Package: tex-common
Version: 0.13
Severity: normal
The tex-common debconf question says:
"The default is not to manage permissions with debconf, but this is
just because this is required for building other Debian packages."
Please clarify. I am a Debian developer, and I build Debian packages.
Does this mean I should not use defoma to manage TeX fonts? Or is it
just a particular class of Debian packages that rule out use of
defoma, like packages that include fonts? Or just those that install
TeX fonts?
I see the description is already pretty long, but maybe you could add
a pointer to the appropriate discussion in
/usr/share/doc/tex-common/Debian-TeX-Policy.*.
- Jim Van Zandt
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500,
'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.15
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C (charmap=ANSI_X3.4-1968)
Versions of packages tex-common depends on:
ii debconf [debconf-2.0] 1.4.71 Debian configuration management sy
ii ucf 2.002 Update Configuration File: preserv
tex-common recommends no packages.
-- debconf information:
tex-common/groupname: users
tex-common/managedlsr: var cache main
tex-common/cnf_name:
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
