Hi Tobias,
Thanks for piping in! On 13 December 2021 at 16:42, Tobias Hansen wrote: | On 12/13/21 4:30 PM, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > Hi Alexandre, | > | > On 13 December 2021 at 09:08, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote: | > | Hi there, Dirk! | > | | > | I see that, libgslblasc0 is upgradable to version 2.7.1+dfsg-3 here, but | > | the upgrade available version of libgsl25 (2.6+dfsg-2 -> 2.7+dfsg-2) | > | requires libgslbalsc0 2.7.1+dfsg-2, which is unavailable. | > | | > | Digging around here, I noticed that the only package that still depends | > | on libgsl25 after a supposed upgrade is sagemath. Is there a way to let | > | them know this and try tu upgrade their dependency to libgsl27? Or is it | > | better to bugreport them? | > | > That is is a bit of grey zone to me too. Sometimes the ftpmasters help nudge | > this, or even do a 'binary build' (unchanged package rebuilt under new dependencies). | > I am CCing Sebastian who has been very helpful for the GSL update / informal | > transition. He may be able to suggest a next step. | > | > Otherwise you could start with a simple email to the maintainer. | > | > Cheers, Dirk | | sagemath maintainer here. The sagemath 9.2 package is broken at the moment and does not build and I wouldn't expect it to work very well either. I am working on a big update but that may still need some days until it's finished. In the meantime I wouldn't mind if sagemath 9.2 breaks further. Thanks for maintaining such a large and complex package. It looks like things are being addressed and Alexandre should be back to complete setup soon too. Cheers, Dirk | Best, | | Tobias | -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
