Hi Alexandre,
On 13 December 2021 at 09:08, Alexandre Lymberopoulos wrote: | Hi there, Dirk! | | I see that, libgslblasc0 is upgradable to version 2.7.1+dfsg-3 here, but | the upgrade available version of libgsl25 (2.6+dfsg-2 -> 2.7+dfsg-2) | requires libgslbalsc0 2.7.1+dfsg-2, which is unavailable. | | Digging around here, I noticed that the only package that still depends | on libgsl25 after a supposed upgrade is sagemath. Is there a way to let | them know this and try tu upgrade their dependency to libgsl27? Or is it | better to bugreport them? That is is a bit of grey zone to me too. Sometimes the ftpmasters help nudge this, or even do a 'binary build' (unchanged package rebuilt under new dependencies). I am CCing Sebastian who has been very helpful for the GSL update / informal transition. He may be able to suggest a next step. Otherwise you could start with a simple email to the maintainer. Cheers, Dirk | Best, Alexandre | | On Dec 12 2021, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | > PS As a follow-up, it also looks like the Debian aggregation pages think | > everything should be fine: | > | > https://packages.debian.org/sid/libgslcblas0 | > | > Maybe you just has bad luck with a mirror, or hit a mirro sync? | > | > Dirk | > | > -- | > https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org | | -- | =============================================================================== | Alexandre Lymberopoulos - lym...@gmail.com | =============================================================================== -- https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
