Hi Andrius,
On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 09:20:51AM +0300, Andrius Merkys wrote:
>
> Normally I would concur here, as I do not read [1] as allowing anyone to
> override severe violations of the Debian policy. Moreover, autorm
> deadline is reset each time a message arrives on this bug thread.
You are right, but well, lots of mailboxes recieved >10 mails for the
very same issue. That does not lead to more productivity and since I
considered the issue settled I took the freedom to take some means I
would not use under normal circumstances. Resetting the autoremoval
counter again if new processing might have taken longer than expected
would require observing things closely and take another amount of
energy. Sorry for pushing my pragmatic approach here.
> Nevertheless, there are no real conflicts involving libcifpp1 as of now,
> and since 1.0.1-5 is in NEW already, there should be none in future
> releases too.
I admit I've asked for rejection to rather upload 1.0.1-4 which was
never released.
Kind regards
Andreas.
> [1] https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer#severities
--
http://fam-tille.de
