On Mon Jun 14, 2021 at 10:19:13 +0100, Mike Crowe wrote: > Hi Adam, > > On Monday 14 June 2021 at 09:16:51 +0200, Adam Lackorzynski wrote: > > Ok, thanks. Meantime I changed all of this static memory handling to be > > more dynamic, also addressing this case I believe. The 'magic' constant > > is gone, so hopefully any of those cases. > > Thanks for the extremely quick fixes. The current state of master > (b7727586547b4a24939bef4176b8a0d5ad91d62d) seems to work perfectly for me. > > Since this didn't turn out to be a regression, is it safe to assume that > there's little chance of the fix ending up in Bullseye?
Let's see. I've put all on the v2.8.x branch, being corruption fixes. Maybe it still works out if an upload is being done timely. ;) Adam
