Hi Adam, On Monday 14 June 2021 at 09:16:51 +0200, Adam Lackorzynski wrote: > Ok, thanks. Meantime I changed all of this static memory handling to be > more dynamic, also addressing this case I believe. The 'magic' constant > is gone, so hopefully any of those cases.
Thanks for the extremely quick fixes. The current state of master (b7727586547b4a24939bef4176b8a0d5ad91d62d) seems to work perfectly for me. Since this didn't turn out to be a regression, is it safe to assume that there's little chance of the fix ending up in Bullseye? Thanks. Mike.
