Hi Adam Thanks for your email.
Since one of the conditions is that the version needs to be at least in testing I think we should wait until Sunday to have version 3.2.0 ported instead of 3.1.7. And thanks for your offer to help, I will probably need it ;P Best regards! On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 8:45 PM Adam Borowski <kilob...@angband.pl> wrote: > > Package: ugrep > Version: 3.2.0+dfsg-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Hi! > Could you please upload a version of ugrep to buster-bpo? > > To save you from having to RTFM, here's the procedure: > * append ~bpo10+1 to version number (+2 on 2nd upload...) > * set distribution in the new changelog entry to "buster-backports" > * first upload of a backport needs to go through bpo-NEW, thus binaries > need to be included > * bpo uploads these days go to the same queue as regular uploads > * a version to be backported needs to be already in testing > > I'm not certain if DMs can upload their own packages to bpo-NEW, I think > they can't. As there's no requirement for a backporter to be an uploader, > I can go through all the motions for +1 if you don't wish to bother with > a sponsored upload the first time. > > > Meow! > -- System Information: > Debian Release: 11.0 > APT prefers testing-security > APT policy: (500, 'testing-security'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), > (1, 'experimental') > Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) > Foreign Architectures: i386 > > Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-6-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads) > Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=en_US:en > Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash > Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init) > > Versions of packages ugrep depends on: > ii libbz2-1.0 1.0.8-4 > ii libc6 2.31-12 > ii libgcc-s1 11-20210319-1 > ii liblz4-1 1.9.3-2 > ii liblzma5 5.2.5-2 > ii libpcre2-8-0 10.36-2 > ii libstdc++6 11-20210319-1 > ii libzstd1 1.4.8+dfsg-2.1 > ii zlib1g 1:1.2.11.dfsg-2 > > ugrep recommends no packages. > > ugrep suggests no packages. > > -- no debconf information -- Ricardo Ribalda
