I did further testing, so tried to wrap up my findings in a
hopefully nice Karnaugh table below (dreading mta rewrap at
this instant):

        Layout  Plain   Raid    LVM     LVM+Crypto
Locale  Device
en_US   Sata    blank   blank   ok      ok
en_US   NVMe    ok      blank   ok      ok
fr_FR   Sata    ok      ok       extrapolating things are ok
fr_FR   NVMe    ok      ok       here, worth a double check?

Values:
  - "blank" is for when the screen hangs on the intro window
    before the shell;
  - "ok" when I can reach the prompt.

Fields:
  - "Layout" is the partitioning scheme chosen when installing
    the rescued system:
      - "Plain" for the simplest automatic partition scheme;
      - "Raid" for a simple automatic partition scheme where the
        root partition is on a single member Raid 0 array;
      - "LVM" for the automatic partition scheme;
      - "LVM+Crypto" for the configuration involving crypto;
  - "Locale" depends on the language selected when starting
    rescue-mode: en_US for the default, or fr_FR;
  - "Device" is the interconnection to the physical drive:
    Sata for the Thinkpad W500 and virtual machines, or NVMe for
    the Zbook15 G6

Each time I selected automatic assembly of the Raid array, and
tried to chroot inside a /dev/md/0.  I couldn't check Bios mode
with NVMes (Zbook15 G6), and didn't check EFI mode with the Sata
physical machine (Thinkpad W500); but on virtual machine,
neither Bios nor EFI did any difference to the testing results.
All tests are carried on with a root partition in Ext4, no other
format tested yet.

For short, the know problematic situation is when rescuing soft
Raid, or plain partitions on Sata drives, but only when one
speaks english.

Hth,
-- 
Étienne Mollier <etienne.moll...@mailoo.org>
Fingerprint:  8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
Sent from /dev/pts/7, please excuse my verbosity.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to