On Thu, Dec 24, 2020 at 09:58:57PM +0200, Graham Inggs wrote: > Source: python-cobra > Version: 0.19.0-1 > Severity: serious > Tags: sid bullseye > X-Debbugs-CC: debian...@lists.debian.org > User: debian...@lists.debian.org > Usertags: regression > > Hi Maintainer > > The autopkgtests of python-cobra recently started to fail in testing [1]. > I've copied what I hope is the relevant part of the log below. > > Regards > Graham > > > [1] https://ci.debian.net/packages/p/python-cobra/testing/amd64/ > > > ==================================== ERRORS > ==================================== > ______________ ERROR at setup of TestManipulation.test_escape_ids > ______________ > > filename = '/usr/lib/python3/dist-packages/cobra/test/data/textbook.xml.gz' > number = <class 'float'> > f_replace = {'F_GENE': <function _f_gene at 0x7f75f8c3cc10>, > 'F_GENE_REV': <function _f_gene_rev at 0x7f75f8c3cca0>, 'F_GROUP': > <function _f_group at 0x7f75f8c3cf70>, 'F_GROUP_REV': <function > _f_group_rev at 0x7f75f8531040>, ...} > kwargs = {} > doc = <libsbml.SBMLDocument; proxy of <Swig Object of type > 'SBMLDocument *' at 0x7f75f402cc60> > > cobra_error = CobraSBMLError('Something went wrong reading the SBML > model. Most likely the SBML model is not valid. Please check > tha...ame)`\nIf the model is valid and cannot be read please open an > issue at https://github.com/opencobra/cobrapy/issues .')
This is also a FTBFS. Trying to upgrade to 0.20.0 for checking whether that would help: After some minor adjustments the first blocker is missing diskcache (#940625). cu Adrian
