Attempting to switch to asciidoctor has resulted in several issues including a greater difficulty in keeping the builds reproducible (date insertion issues). In addition I am not fan of the asciidoctor style and bringing in asciidoc's directly would result in license contamination. Since asciidoc is no longer EOL with the release of a py3 version which should require no changes to autorevision, I would rather stick with that.
On Tue, 3 Apr 2018 04:14:58 -0700 Joseph Herlant <herla...@gmail.com> wrote: > Package: autorevision > Version: 1.21-1 > Severity: wishlist > > Dear Maintainer, > > Asciidoc is currently facing its end of life and I'm working with the > different > packages that depend on it to get its EOL go smooth. > > There are several alternatives to asciidoc like asciidoctor for > example (which is the replacement recommended by asciidoc developers). > > Could you have your package migrated to an alternative system please? > > Thanks for your help, > Joseph > >
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP
