to 21. tammik. 2021 klo 16.46 Santiago Garcia Mantinan
(ma...@debian.org) kirjoitti:
>
> > > iface br0 inet dhcp
> > >         bridge_ports all
> > >         bridge_hw enp6s0
> >
> > This would obviously change the syntax of bridge_hw but it would
> > accomplish what we need with a syntax that follows the Consistent
> > Network Device Naming idea.
>
> I think I didn't express myself well, I don't mean to change the syntax but
> to overload it a bit, you could specify:
>
> bridge_hw enp6s0
>
> or
>
> bridge_hw 00:11:22:33:44:55
>
> whatever you prefer.
>
> Is this ok to you? or will it confuse people?

As long as it's documented that either one can be used, it would
retain backward-compatibility with the old syntax, so this should work
out fine. That works fine for me.

Martin-Éric

Reply via email to