> > iface br0 inet dhcp > > bridge_ports all > > bridge_hw enp6s0 > > This would obviously change the syntax of bridge_hw but it would > accomplish what we need with a syntax that follows the Consistent > Network Device Naming idea.
I think I didn't express myself well, I don't mean to change the syntax but to overload it a bit, you could specify: bridge_hw enp6s0 or bridge_hw 00:11:22:33:44:55 whatever you prefer. Is this ok to you? or will it confuse people? I'll try to explain the two usages on the doc and the news if we implement this. Regards. -- Manty/BestiaTester -> http://manty.net
